Accueil » Forum » Musicians forum »
Giving credits to your fellow musicians - fair enough or unnecessary?

Giving credits to your fellow musicians - fair enough or unnecessary?

shiihs Posted on 26 mai 2026 #21
shiihs
SUPPORTER
Posts: 92
Joined: 29 août 2022
SoulFingers wrote:
MySounds wrote:
I can think of at least one usecase I'd have no problems with: take drums, bass, guitar uploads in that sequence. If I now want to inject my own bass upload between drums and guitars, I would have to cut out the existing bass.

Yes, among other topics it means that too: removing instruments to replace them with the own one.


I’m probably lost in translation here, but this kind of track remixing is, for me, the foundation of Wikiloops. I fail to understand why replacing a bass track with a different bass track, while keeping the additions before and after that bass track, would be wrong — as long as the result is posted in the same remix tree, obviously, and isn’t just uploaded as "my own work" without any attribution.
+2
MySounds Posted on 26 mai 2026 #22
MySounds
SUPPORTER
Posts: 357
Joined: 19 mars 2022
shiihs wrote:


I’m probably lost in translation here, but this kind of track remixing is, for me, the foundation of Wikiloops. I fail to understand why replacing a bass track with a different bass track, while keeping the additions before and after that bass track, would be wrong — as long as the result is posted in the same remix tree, obviously, and isn’t just uploaded as "my own work" without any attribution.


I think the attribution is the main issue here.
+1
Ernie Ball 2221 Regular Slinky Gitarrensaiten
Ernie Ball 2221 Regular Slinky Gitarrensaiten
Saitensatz für E-Gitarre
5,90 €
iThis widget links to Thomann, our affiliate partner. We may receive a commission when you purchase a product there. Visit Shop
SoulFingers Posted on 27 mai 2026 #23
SoulFingers
SUPPORTER
Posts: 91
Joined: 7 août 2021
Dick wrote:

I still do not think it is, the problematic part is the way this comes across communication-wise.



Yes, I think that’s what causes a lot of irritation.

Dick wrote:

That sentence creates a weird resonance in me - I have to ask:
How can you possibly tell the difference? Maybe it is enjoyed whilst being consumed? Maybe it is enjoyed so much that people forget their manners and grab it without giving thanks, letting it look like mere consumption.
I have insight in the ratio of consumers (listeners and downloaders) vs. active members who give likes or write comments, and they do not meet your idea of respect among musicians, applying offline expectations only tilts the picture towards unbearable.
Online, you might as well be happy to be consumed... it does show interest in a way.


That’s a very good question. With ‚being consumed‘ I mean the lack of good manners indeed. Just being listened to isn’t a bad thing, not at all. Maybe my expectations are a bit too high since I usually would at least leave a thumb if I use a track of another member. That’s the way I am, just trying to be polite as an active member of the community.
MySounds Posted on 27 mai 2026 #24
MySounds
SUPPORTER
Posts: 357
Joined: 19 mars 2022
My takeaways from this thread:

- keep people informed about what you do with their tracks even if it takes a little extra effort,

- act as if you're a guest on Wikiloops and not the owner,

- don't do anything that might lead Dick to invest time on technical implementation stuff. I need him to focus on getting rid of the sequencer setting when choosing multiple instruments B)
+2
Bradford Posted on 27 mai 2026 #25
Bradford
SUPPORTER
Posts: 114
Joined: 23 août 2021
Somewhat related but for me this falls in the manners and respect category:
I feel very strongly about submitting some form of a Thank You whenever a comment is left on one of my remixes.
Some time back, months I'm sure, something changed and now the only way to make sure that I've done my thank-you's is to open the actual song URLs and check. Pretty sure my thank you comments were visible in my feed before. I hope I'm explaining this in a way that's understood. I understand the ongoing quest for less system resource consumption but perhaps this change might lead to less interaction, which is in conflict with WL core principles.
Another way to say this is that, in Newsfeed view, it used to display in a fully expanded format, including my Thank You's. Perhaps you all know a better way to do what I want.
Yes, I'm old school. My momma used to make sure I sent Thank You letters. Actually, my wife still sends 'em. I digress.
+5
MySounds Posted on 27 mai 2026 #26
MySounds
SUPPORTER
Posts: 357
Joined: 19 mars 2022
@Bradford

I`m probably one of the worst offenders and you`re absolutely right, even a simple Thank You for a comment shouldn`t be too difficult, especially as I am grateful for each and every comment and interaction. So ... THANK YOU for reminding me ;)
rootshell Posted on 27 mai 2026 #27
rootshell
SUPPORTER
Posts: 555
Joined: 4 juil. 2020
Bradford wrote:
Somewhat related but for me this falls in the manners and respect category:
I feel very strongly about submitting some form of a Thank You whenever a comment is left on one of my remixes.
Some time back, months I'm sure, something changed and now the only way to make sure that I've done my thank-you's is to open the actual song URLs and check. Pretty sure my thank you comments were visible in my feed before. I hope I'm explaining this in a way that's understood. I understand the ongoing quest for less system resource consumption but perhaps this change might lead to less interaction, which is in conflict with WL core principles.
Another way to say this is that, in Newsfeed view, it used to display in a fully expanded format, including my Thank You's. Perhaps you all know a better way to do what I want.
Yes, I'm old school. My momma used to make sure I sent Thank You letters. Actually, my wife still sends 'em. I digress.


I echo this newsfeed view Bradford, something changed, usually requires an additional step to open the track in a separate window to check replies/activity/etc. I liked the previous newsfeed format where all replies and views could be viewed inline w/o additional clicks to open a new window. As it sits now, it seems you can miss interactions in it's current state.
+3
Dick Posted on 27 mai 2026 #28
Dick
SUPPORTER
Posts: 2994
Joined: 30 déc. 2010
shiihs wrote:
I’m probably lost in translation here


Yes, that seemed to be the case. We are not discussing the wikiloops standard case of two bassists creating different remixes of the same track - these branch-offs are absolutely fine. I posted some scenarios on what I called "cross-mixing" whilst you were typing your post, I hope these help dissolve the misunderstanding.

SoulFingers wrote:
With ‚being consumed‘ I mean the lack of good manners indeed. Just being listened to isn’t a bad thing, not at all. Maybe my expectations are a bit too high since I usually would at least leave a thumb if I use a track of another member. That’s the way I am, just trying to be polite as an active member of the community.


As you may imagine (now that the "live" panel is visible to you), I was kinda worried the large amount of "listener" activity that is visible now might trigger the "look at those ill-mannered consumers!" emotion. It does reveal (amongs other things) that there is a lot of otherwise echo-less listening activity on this site.
That's why I'm hoping to be able to distinguish which impressions users have, but that's another threads topic :)

To follow up on mySounds attempt to state take-aways, here are mine:
1. I will move on to working on the extended user blocking feature. I do not see that as a tool to educate or punish people, I see it as a missing tool to have so we don't step on each others toes.
2. I would like to come back to the mentoring and manners aspects discussed here - I would prefer role-modelling and smart nudging towards manners, and I do have some ideas on that which I'll pass by your eyes first
3. I'll check what happened to the comment display on newsfeeds - but guys, please, open separate threads for such feedback in the future :)
+2
Ernie Ball 2221 Regular Slinky Gitarrensaiten
Ernie Ball 2221 Regular Slinky Gitarrensaiten
Saitensatz für E-Gitarre
5,90 €
iThis widget links to Thomann, our affiliate partner. We may receive a commission when you purchase a product there. Visit Shop
les jam sessions en ligne wikiloops sont rendues possibles grâce au support amical de:
user profile image
I´m not a very good guitarist but this site is awesome. Will keep on supporting :-) Greetings from Germany :-)
Chuck Stew

wikiloops.com utilise des Cookies pour vous apporter la meilleure expérience de navigation.
En apprendre plus sur notre charte des données privées.